Biotech, pharma industry and the academic world: why do they need each other and why is this needed
Maurizio Mariani, Elena Cattaneo, Michele Mondini, Chris Torrance, Ludo Lauwers, Massimo Boriero, Si, 51 views

The session is organised in partnership with Johnson and Johnson PRD a Division of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Bioindustry Park Bi.P.Ca, the Innovation Cluster bioPmed, 2i3T the University of Turin incubator, the Biotecnology Foundation Turin, the Molecular biotechnology Center – University of Turin and Farmindustria.

Goal of the session is to discuss the importance of the value chain of biotech and pharma industry in order to discuss the roles for all actors and to explain why it is so important for society that the value chain works, underlining which is the role and importance of scientists, particularly young scientists. All actors involved share similar problems that can influence their activity and development. The panel will represent different actors that compose the value chain of biotech and pharma in the following fields: Research; Start-ups; Venture Capitalists; Pharma Industry; Cluster.

The geographical distribution of grants in Europe: Brain-Gain or Brain-Drain?
Jerzy Langer, Maciej Wojtkowski, András Málnási-Csizmadia, Adrian Curaj, 58 views
Eastern European countries have a low success rate of applications for research support from European organisations, such as the European Research Council or the European Science Foundation. However, it should not to be seen as an “East vs. West” issue. Is it possible that young and brilliant scientists – either from “Eastern” or “Western” countries – who are rejected are victims of the lack of funding of research institutions in their home countries? European research organisations are far from perfect and they need more resources. The resources in turn come from Member States, which requests priority support from its heads of government, and the wheel turns... The aim with this session is to trigger a discussion on the sources leading to the unbalanced situation of grants distribution.
Science in a borderless world
Suzanne Fortier, Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker, 52 views

Science has always been an international endeavour, with scientists freely exchanging information and attending meetings world-wide. However, largely triggered by new technologies and cultural globalization, internalisation has entered into a borderless world. Today’s science environment is characterized by the high mobility of researchers, a growing number of multi-sector international R&D partnerships, an increased number of multinational research facilities, and open access to publications and data. Global challenges, particularly in environment and health, highlight the importance of promoting and supporting partnerships that bring together talent and perspectives from across nations and disciplines. Meanwhile, the recent economic crisis faced by all nations has focused their attention on investment in S&T for their own prosperity and future.

The challenge is to build the flexibility and dexterity needed to participate in highly complex and dynamic R&D networks, while maintaining a balance between domestic and global interests. How can national research systems respond to these trends? What has been achieved? What opportunities need to be explored and promoted? How can funding agencies cooperate in responding to these challenges? How can international policy support both access to knowledge and protection of intellectual property? The session aims to address and discuss these questions, encourage discussion, and outline a course of action.

When Scientists read literature...
Alice Jenkins, Gowan Dawson, Alison Martin, Stuart Robertson, 44 views

How do the cultural activities of practicing scientists affect their scientific thought? In particular, do scientists read literary texts in different ways from non-scientists? And do their literary experiences, tastes and preferences influence the construction and presentation of their own work? In order to understand how science and literature interact today, we need to examine their relationships in the period in which both fields were forming mature identities as professional disciplines. Accordingly, this session will discuss the influence of literature in science through four case-studies of major nineteenth-century scientists who were also prolific and enthusiastic readers: Alexander von Humboldt, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell and Darwin's rival naturalist, Richard Owen.

Each of the four panel speakers is an expert in the interdisciplinary field of literature and science studies. Each is also an experienced and talented speaker. In this session front-line interdisciplinary research that is accessible and engaging for general audiences will be presented. The map of literature and science that emerges will give us a basis for wideranging discussion of nineteenth-century as well as contemporary issues of science in culture.

Shedding light on neutrinos
Francesca Di Lodovico, Carlo Giunti, Federico Sanchez, Mauro Mezzetto, Lee Thompson, 73 views

The most mysterious particles in our current model of the universe are the neutrinos. They pass through space and the Earth with almost no interaction. They are difficult to detect and yet they are thought to play a fundamental role in the formation of the Universe. This makes attempts to understand their nature of crucial importance to our understanding of where we came from. Over time there has been improvements in techniques to understand their nature which have revealed surprising results. Neutrinos can change their type! Theories predict only three types of neutrinos and do not predict neutrinos can change from one type to another. The result that they can change type has profound implications on our understanding of the Universe.

In this session we will introduce these mysterious particles and explain their importance in physics which attempts to describe the Universe. We will also survey the current findings including the latest hot-off-the-press news in the continuing effort to uncover these elusive, but critical little neutral ones.

Shedding light on neutrinos - Part 2
Francesca Di Lodovico, Carlo Giunti, Federico Sanchez, Mauro Mezzetto, Lee Thompson, 51 views

The most mysterious particles in our current model of the universe are the neutrinos. They pass through space and the Earth with almost no interaction. They are difficult to detect and yet they are thought to play a fundamental role in the formation of the Universe. This makes attempts to understand their nature of crucial importance to our understanding of where we came from. Over time there has been improvements in techniques to understand their nature which have revealed surprising results. Neutrinos can change their type! Theories predict only three types of neutrinos and do not predict neutrinos can change from one type to another. The result that they can change type has profound implications on our understanding of the Universe.

In this session we will introduce these mysterious particles and explain their importance in physics which attempts to describe the Universe. We will also survey the current findings including the latest hot-off-the-press news in the continuing effort to uncover these elusive, but critical little neutral ones.

Addiction treatment – the limits of research findings
Roland Simon,Marina Davoli, John Strang, Michael Farrell, Gerhard Bühringer, Pier Paolo Pani, 14 views

Addiction is a disease combining physical, psychological and social aspects. Addiction treatment is an excellent case to study how research findings have effected clinical practice and what can hinder its implementation. The session focus on experiences and possibilities to improve implementation of findings, where speakers concentrate on examples of successful transfer and describe problems on the other side.

In the first part we describe how research has informed clinical practice and what problems this process can face. Clinical research on pharmacological and psychosocial treatment has changed the understanding and treatment of addictions, whereas behavioural treatment has partly developed through advances in qualitative research. In the second part we discuss how to improve integration of scientific output into addiction treatment and discuss what help systematic reviews can provide, how to integrate evidence into guidelines, how to handle lack of evidence and asks the question, and what clinicians can get from guidelines. The input should feed an debate between panel and audience on the relationship between research and practice in this specific field of treatment.

Scientists in the classroom and students in the lab: The making of future scientists
Silvia Imarisio, Elena Ceva, Ulla Engelmann, Giovanna Guslini, Tony Scott, Alessandro Zunino, 25 views

Promoting science in schools is an investment for the future. Who will be the next generation of scientists? As fewer students decide to follow a career in science, we need to sow the seeds of interest on a European level.

A tried and tested formula is to bring scientists' expertise into the classroom, while inviting students to experience real experiments in the laboratory. These activities seem to be quite effective: visits to laboratories for students and teachers (a joint initiative by JRC in Ispra and the Italian School Authority has resulted in an increase of more than 10% of students who chose science in the first year of secondary school since 2004); projects that allow students and teachers to exchange views about science in school; national science competitions to motivate students and teachers of science, art, technology and languages through interdisciplinary activities (e.g. the “Science and creativity in the classroom” competition in 2009 and the Irish Young Scientists and Technology Exhibition).

While students get to experience “real” science, scientists get feedback on their activities from a vast audience outside the laboratory, listen to fresh and innovative ideas, and set up a network for the scientists of the future.

The challenge of biodiversity
Daniel Schaffer, Cristina Serra, Ferdinando Boero, Decio Ripandelli, Marco Cattaneo, 14 views

The UN has designated 2010 as the International Year for Biodiversity. The year-long event will culminate with a special high-level meeting at the UN headquarters in New York, in September, during the UN's General Assembly. The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS) and the InterAcademy Panel on International Issues (IAP), have jointly organized this session that examines the complex issue of biodiversity conservation and sustainable use from a variety of perspectives that lie at the science-policy interface. We will try to look at biodiversity as a basic science by exploring what we know and what we don't about the planet's species and ecosystems.

In particular, the session is intended to: examine the progress (or lack of it) that has been made since the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in understanding the ecosystem services; discuss the role of open space and Nature reserves in the preservation of habitats keeping in mind that it is tenuous to pretend to conserve single species (e.g. by the construction of corridors) if their habitats are destroyed; outline how international organizations can assist in the governance of places that do not fall under the jurisdiction of a single nation (oceans and polar regions); seek to analyze efforts to assign economic value to ecosystems services so that the full measure of a nation's wealth can be accurately assessed. We will also discuss the need to build scientific capacity in the developing world, and address what the generic public knows about biodiversity and how people do perceive the related problems, along with Governments actions taken worldwide and aimed at understanding and protecting biodiversity.

Nano to Touch communication workshop
Jennifer Palumbo, Frank Burnet, Paul Hix, Sabine Grossmann, Hans-Christian Becker, Ellen Biermans, 25 views

Delegates are invited to take part in an interactive workshop on direct communication between scientists and members of the public, to discover new ways to communicate research topics and engage with audiences of all kinds. A professional facilitator will animate a lively workshop with practical examples and demonstrations of what works and what doesn’t work when speaking directly to the public.

Areas covered will include tips and techniques for:

• Handling hot topics

Participants will experiment with techniques designed to engage people in discussion about controversial issues, in particular using drama. In this process, they will learn how promote discussion, facilitate debate, handle controversy in the public and answer difficult questions.

 

• How to get your message across

The facilitator presents an example of dialogue between a scientist and a non-expert (journalist or public in a scientific event) and discusses important points and possible pitfalls with the group. Volunteer participants will be interviewed and given feedback on their performance.

 

The workshop will also integrate contributions from scientists who have gained a great deal of experience of communication with the public by working in scientific labs inside science museums through the EU project “Nano to touch”. Participants will hear real life experiences of questions asked by museum visitors, situations that can arise when speaking to non-experts and how best to handle them without losing track of the main point – the accuracy of the concept described.

The experience gained in the work

1 2