Both the US and the EU have recently undergone major administrative changes, which not only offer the potential for a restart in trans-Atlantic cooperation in tackling global challenges, but have equally triggered a debate about the role of science in policy-making. In appointing the former President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), John Holdren, as his Science Adviser and Nobel Laureate, Stephen Chu, as his Secretary of Energy, the Obama Administration has put scientific evidence back into the core of the policy agenda. Similarly, the Barroso Commission has identified growth based on knowledge and innovation as key to its mandate and announced the creation of a Science Adviser post, while its independent research arm under Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, the Joint Research Centre, is embarking on a new 10 year strategy responding to an ever-growing demand for customer-driven S&T support to policy-making.
In October 2009, the AAAS and JRC took the initiative of organising a Trans-Atlantic Workshop, bringing together 25 high-profile individuals from government, industry, academia, lobby groups etc, each with experiences of real-life scientific support to policy-making. This symposium will reveal what was identified in terms of best practices and pitfalls on both sides of the Atlantic. Speakers will evidence these findings with timely examples of “positive” and “negative” case-studies, exposing the facts as to why things worked or did not, who were the actors involved, what is/was at stake, and what conclusions we can draw about the bigger picture of “evidence based policy versus policy-biased evidence”.